SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
iTunes 9 Deja Vu
August 11th, 2009 by jens

AppleInsider reports on the iTunes 9 rumors:

“The social networking integration that we reported iTunes 9 would have seems to be part of a bigger social networking push by Apple,” the report states. “We’ve been informed that Apple has plans to tie iTunes 9 into a “Social” application that they plan to release in the future.”

This sounds like the kind of app (though separate from iTunes) that Jessica Kahn and I kept trying in vain to get Apple to build, circa 2003-2005. Maybe they’ll get some use out of our abandoned prototypes.

The report goes on to say that the new application would allow users to share their listening habits with friends [and] send music to friends”

Mike Estee and I had actually prototyped this in iChat in 2003, but the feature never got approved since there were so many more important things to add, like 3-way video conferencing. (Plus the fact that Apple execs turned white as a sheet if you said the words “send music” near them.)

Anyway, personal bitterness aside, I think it’s really amusing that Apple keeps shoving the kitchen sink into iTunes, since that has to be the single nastiest, hardest-to-extend codebase they have — it’s their last remaining Carbon app, with a foundation that dates back to Casady & Greene’s SoundJam, circa 1998.


5 Responses  
  • Jens Ayton writes:
    August 11th, 200910:55 AMat

    The home of the rumour now has some grade-A high-quality screenshots *cough, cough hack*. Of course, this lousy fake doesn’t disprove the original rumour (and it doesn’t appear to come from the same source).

  • chucker23n (LJ) writes:
    August 11th, 200911:37 AMat

    [I]t’s their last remaining Carbon app, with a foundation that dates back to Casady & Greene’s SoundJam, circa 1998.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but since Final Cut Pro (as the only part of the Final Cut Studio suite; all other apps look rather different) still sports the same old UI, I figured it’s still Carbon as well, which would make it roughly the same age as iTunes, and probably more complex (though with the advantage of far fewer bolted-on capabilities it was never supposed to have).

  • Jens Alfke writes:
    August 11th, 200912:15 PMat

    chucker — you may be right. (An amusing coincidence is that, when I came back to Apple in 1998, I had the same start date as the entire Final Cut team who were moving over en masse from Macromedia.)

  • rpkrajewski (LJ) writes:
    August 11th, 20098:08 PMat

    Obviously, the way to make a program useful and important is to give it a nasty, hard-to-extend codebase ;)

  • http://benstanfield.com/MyID.config.php writes:
    August 11th, 200911:16 PMat

    Ahh, how I loved SoundJam. I had so many skins for that sucker. And the visualizations were mind-blowing, although Apple left out my favorite when they shipped version 1 of iTunes. It was a sad day for me at that MacWorld Expo when I realized I’d never see another version of Sound Jam.


»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa