Comments on: Career Update, Part ++n http://jens.mooseyard.com/2009/07/career-update-part-n/ Little boxes made of words, by Jens Alfke Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:58:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Avi Drissman http://jens.mooseyard.com/2009/07/career-update-part-n/comment-page-1/#comment-3061 Avi Drissman Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:40:17 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2009/07/career-update-part-n/#comment-3061 They sometimes say that it's easier to keep track of who doesn't work at Google than who does. When I heard that you'd joined, it was kinda curious, as you weren't working on client apps. (There's only one other person that I can think of, Jörg, who did that.) A few days ago I saw your first patch but didn't realize that you'd actually switched teams. Welcome! I celebrate your transfer, if only because it means that I can foist all the CSSM/CDSA coding onto you :) —Avi They sometimes say that it’s easier to keep track of who doesn’t work at Google than who does. When I heard that you’d joined, it was kinda curious, as you weren’t working on client apps. (There’s only one other person that I can think of, Jörg, who did that.) A few days ago I saw your first patch but didn’t realize that you’d actually switched teams. Welcome! I celebrate your transfer, if only because it means that I can foist all the CSSM/CDSA coding onto you :)

—Avi

]]> By: josh susser http://jens.mooseyard.com/2009/07/career-update-part-n/comment-page-1/#comment-3062 josh susser Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:51:56 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2009/07/career-update-part-n/#comment-3062 Hey, that's pretty cool working on HTML 5 stuff. Seems like there could be a lot of déjà vu back to OpenDoc days with client side storage, embedding and the like. I hope it ends up being fun. Will Scott McCloud be putting you in issue #2? Hey, that’s pretty cool working on HTML 5 stuff. Seems like there could be a lot of déjà vu back to OpenDoc days with client side storage, embedding and the like. I hope it ends up being fun. Will Scott McCloud be putting you in issue #2?

]]>