Comments on: Box2D http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/ Little boxes made of words, by Jens Alfke Sun, 02 May 2010 05:43:47 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jon Hjelle http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2124 Jon Hjelle Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:32 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2124 There's someone working on their own interpretation of "Crayon Physics" using Chipmunk for the physics. Also looks pretty sweet. <a href="http://www.slembcke.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10&p=19&hilit=crayon#p19" rel="nofollow">http://www.slembcke.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10&p=19&hilit=crayon#p19</a> There’s someone working on their own interpretation of “Crayon Physics” using Chipmunk for the physics. Also looks pretty sweet. http://www.slembcke.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&#38;t=10&#38;p=19&#38;hilit=crayon#p19

]]> By: soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2D physics http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2123 soeren says &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2D physics Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:04:53 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2123 [...] Jens (Stickies, iChat, Safari RSS, etc.) ponders using Core Animation subclasses to integrate a physics engine. [...] […] Jens (Stickies, iChat, Safari RSS, etc.) ponders using Core Animation subclasses to integrate a physics engine. […]

]]> By: Jens Alfke http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2122 Jens Alfke Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:58:15 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2122 @Gus: Thanks! Daniel Jalkut just sent me the same link too. Now I'm wondering which one is faster / more accurate / more featureful. @Jonathan: Heh, we have different opinions on what 'cruft' is. I read the Chipmunk docs and was all "aw man, zillions of functions, warnings about what struct fields I shouldn't touch ... I like Box2D's clean C++ API better." @Gus: Thanks! Daniel Jalkut just sent me the same link too. Now I’m wondering which one is faster / more accurate / more featureful.

@Jonathan: Heh, we have different opinions on what ‘cruft’ is. I read the Chipmunk docs and was all “aw man, zillions of functions, warnings about what struct fields I shouldn’t touch … I like Box2D’s clean C++ API better.”

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2121 Jonathan Wight Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:11:40 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2121 I've played with chipmunk a little and it is really really sweet. The source code is nice and simple, pure C with no C++ cruft anywhere. It's also a lot of fun. I'll look at box2D when Ironcoder 7 is over I’ve played with chipmunk a little and it is really really sweet.

The source code is nice and simple, pure C with no C++ cruft anywhere. It’s also a lot of fun. I’ll look at box2D when Ironcoder 7 is over

]]> By: Gus Mueller http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2120 Gus Mueller Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:23:47 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2120 Actually, that link should have been: http://wiki.slembcke.net/main/published/Chipmunk Actually, that link should have been: http://wiki.slembcke.net/main/published/Chipmunk

]]> By: Gus Mueller http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/11/box2d/comment-page-1/#comment-2119 Gus Mueller Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:22:50 +0000 http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/11/box2d/#comment-2119 There's also Chipmunk: http://www.slembcke.net/photos/v/programming/chipmunk/ Looks neat, and comes with xcode projects. There’s also Chipmunk: http://www.slembcke.net/photos/v/programming/chipmunk/

Looks neat, and comes with xcode projects.

]]>