<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Many Fonts, So Little Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/</link>
	<description>Little boxes made of words, by Jens Alfke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 05:43:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chelt.org</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>chelt.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>re: obscure fonts for the web

You can always try out &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sIFR&lt;/a&gt;. Embed a font in a Flash file, and a Javascript will render that font in the browser, on the fly. There&#039;s always (X)HTML/CSS behind the replaced text, so this method degrades silently if someone doesn&#039;t have access to Flash. Works beautifully with CMSes. Pages with sIFR validate just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: obscure fonts for the web</p>
<p>You can always try out <a href="http://wiki.novemberborn.net/sifr/" rel="nofollow">sIFR</a>. Embed a font in a Flash file, and a Javascript will render that font in the browser, on the fly. There&#8217;s always (X)HTML/CSS behind the replaced text, so this method degrades silently if someone doesn&#8217;t have access to Flash. Works beautifully with CMSes. Pages with sIFR validate just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Alfke</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Alfke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>saoshyant — please be more specific about &quot;font linking&quot;! I searched and found some old competing IE-specific and Netscape-specific technologies. There&#039;s also an &quot;@font-face&quot; directive in CSS2, but from what I&#039;ve seen, it&#039;s not actually supported in browsers yet:

http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/browser_support/basic_concepts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saoshyant — please be more specific about &#8220;font linking&#8221;! I searched and found some old competing IE-specific and Netscape-specific technologies. There&#8217;s also an &#8220;@font-face&#8221; directive in CSS2, but from what I&#8217;ve seen, it&#8217;s not actually supported in browsers yet:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/browser_support/basic_concepts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/browser_support/basic_concepts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saoshyant</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>saoshyant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>You know, while I would agree with your statement that you can&#039;t use obscure fonts on the web back in 2000, or so, I can&#039;t any longer.  I suggest that you look into CSS, and font linking.  The font is then downloaded and cached by the browser just like an image, and the user sees the content through the font you want.  That simple, and if the font isn&#039;t larger than 40 kb, it&#039;s something trivial and worth looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, while I would agree with your statement that you can&#8217;t use obscure fonts on the web back in 2000, or so, I can&#8217;t any longer.  I suggest that you look into CSS, and font linking.  The font is then downloaded and cached by the browser just like an image, and the user sees the content through the font you want.  That simple, and if the font isn&#8217;t larger than 40 kb, it&#8217;s something trivial and worth looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem is that these days I don’t actually have a whole lot of use for fonts. Desktop Publishing is passé, I hardly ever print anything, and when I design something for the web I can’t use obscure fonts that other people don’t have.&quot;


Reminds me of my tour of Moscow -- my guide told me, &quot;Under Communism, we had all the money we wanted, but the stores were empty.  Now, the stores are full, but we have no money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem is that these days I don’t actually have a whole lot of use for fonts. Desktop Publishing is passé, I hardly ever print anything, and when I design something for the web I can’t use obscure fonts that other people don’t have.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reminds me of my tour of Moscow &#8212; my guide told me, &#8220;Under Communism, we had all the money we wanted, but the stores were empty.  Now, the stores are full, but we have no money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beza1e1</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>beza1e1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>Have you seen Gentium and Linux Libertine?

I&#039;m designing flyers and stuff from time to time and i can sometimes use a sepcial font there. My favourite site is dafont.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Gentium and Linux Libertine?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m designing flyers and stuff from time to time and i can sometimes use a sepcial font there. My favourite site is dafont.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beesbuzz.biz</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>beesbuzz.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Okay apparently your OpenID thing works now, but it uses the URL instead of the FOAF-proscribed nickname.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay apparently your OpenID thing works now, but it uses the URL instead of the FOAF-proscribed nickname.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beesbuzz.biz</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>beesbuzz.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Blambot is good if you want a wide variety of comic lettering.  Not really &#039;typography&#039; in the traditional sense, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blambot is good if you want a wide variety of comic lettering.  Not really &#8216;typography&#8217; in the traditional sense, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmissig (LJ)</title>
		<link>http://jens.mooseyard.com/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>jmissig (LJ)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mooseyard.com/Jens/2007/01/so-many-fonts-so-little-print/#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Tom7 &lt;a href=&quot;http://fonts.tom7.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has some fun fonts&lt;/a&gt; you might like as well for more of the hand-drawn look. I particularly like that he has the handwriting of Douglas Adams.

In fact, you should probably check out some of the other stuff Tom7 does. His quirky humor might suit you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom7 <a href="http://fonts.tom7.com/" rel="nofollow">has some fun fonts</a> you might like as well for more of the hand-drawn look. I particularly like that he has the handwriting of Douglas Adams.</p>
<p>In fact, you should probably check out some of the other stuff Tom7 does. His quirky humor might suit you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
